Skip to content

What a month – Early Performance Indication

April was a strange month. We saw dramatic moves after the US Liberation Day, which wreaked havoc in the Equity, Bond, and Currency markets. The S&P dropped 10% in a dramatic unwind of global stability, only to show a large positive day a few days later. Several of the most destabilizing policies were later walked back, delayed, or clarified as bond yields started to increase, showing increasing uncertainty. In the end, the most significant Trade Policy is the remaining Chinese tariffs where others have been modified or delayed.

At the end of the month, April showed a modest decline across most equity markets, but with dramatic intra-month volatility. Not acting provided the right decision, despite the increased uncertainty that prevailed throughout April.

Looking across strategies in April, it seems like CTA, and especially Trend Followers, reduced equity market risk dramatically in the first few days of the correction. As the correction was ‘V’-shaped, with hindsight, this was the wrong decision. Slower strategies might have done a bit better as the frequency did not disturb the strategies.

Line graph showing estimated returns from daily data for various strategies: CTA, MarketNeutral, EquityLS, and EventDriven, rebased to the start of the year, with fluctuations noted from January to May 2025.
NilssonHedge Daily Hedge Fund indices showed dramatic performance divergence

For April, based on our Daily Indices, we note that CTA diverged from the rest of the strategies that mostly kept their positions. Crypto was the exception, with some of the meme coins having dramatic positive performance.

  • Crypto: +9.3%
  • CTA: -5.2%
  • Equity LS: -0.7%
  • Event Driven: -0.1%
  • A table summarizing the performance of various financial strategies for April 2025, detailing the number of positive and negative outcomes, percentage representation, and average monthly and year-to-date performance.

    Acknowledging reporting biases and that we are only a few days into the month, the above results are mirrored by the daily indices, although with different magnitudes (strong results likely to be reported early). CTA at the bottom, and Crypto strategies at the top.

    Table displaying the breakdown of various CTA strategies, including their performance metrics such as number of positive and negative positions, average month-to-date, and year-to-date percentages.

    For CTA engaging in short volatility strategies, we saw generally negative performance with dramatic VIX spikes. We have noted that a few of the larger managers stopped reporting or shut down funds during April. Trend strategies will have a negative skew, with the results expected to decline as we get more managers.

    A table showing the performance of various asset management programs for April, including manager names, program types, and percentage changes in performance.
    Table displaying performance metrics of various investment managers, including manager names, programs, last month's performance, year-to-date performance, risk levels, geometric returns, and Sharpe ratios.

    Looking at the few Managed Futures managers that have reported, we see some long volatility, tail hedge strategies, but also some of the Discretionary Macro strategies at the top of the performance rankings.

    Line graph showing the dispersion of CTA performance from January 2018 to January 2025, with lower, median, and upper lines plotted across the timeline.

    For CTA the dispersion was likely very high. And the bottom quartile manager recorded a loss that was on par with other dramatic months in the Managed Futures history. Jan 18 is still the worst over the last seven years. At least, positions are cleared out and managed are well adapted to catch on new trends as Trade Policy is further clarified.

    Leave a Reply

    Discover more from NilssonHedge

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading